Syntaxhighlighting definition for katepart available?

[wimalopaan]

Hi all,

usually I write my asciidoc-documents using emacs with asciidoc-mode.

But: for all C++ coding I use QtCreator and it would be great if there is a katepart asciidoc syntax definition (qtcreator can use these definitions) to write the documention also inside qtcreator.

Any hints?

--
 Wilhelm

[mojavelinux]

I'm glad you brought this up because we do need to eventually have a syntax definition for AsciiDoc that we can use as the basis of other parser tools. The obvious choice for this definition is a PEG grammar. I think we'll get there. Until then, the most readable definition thus far is probably the highlighter for GTK source view, which I've updated [1].

You can probably draw from the asciidoc.lang file from GTK source view and the Markdown definition for Kate [2] to create a new AsciiDoc definition for Kate. Start with the section titles and it goes pretty quickly.

-Dan

[1] https://github.com/mojavelinux/gtksourceview/blob/asciidoc-language-spec/data/language-specs/asciidoc.lang
[2] https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/applications/kate/repository/revisions/master/entry/part/syntax/data/markdown.xml

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:08 AM, wimalopaan [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi all,

usually I write my asciidoc-documents using emacs with asciidoc-mode.

But: for all C++ coding I use QtCreator and it would be great if there is a katepart asciidoc syntax definition (qtcreator can use these definitions) to write the documention also inside qtcreator.

Any hints?

--
 Wilhelm

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Syntaxhighlighting-definition-for-katepart-available-tp1406.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

... [show rest of quote]

--

Dan Allen | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen